EELB 612 - Murillo

Relevant Professional Standards


NCATE 2000 Standards (http://www.ncate.org/)
Standard 1 – Candidate Performance:
- Candidates preparing to work in schools as teachers or other professional school personnel know and demonstrate the content, pedagogical, and professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary to help all students learn. Assessments indicate that candidates meet professional, state, and institutional standards.
Target: Candidates will consider school, family and community contexts in connecting concepts to students’ prior
experience and applying the ideas to real-world problems.
Target: Candidates will work with students, families and communities in ways that reflect the dispositions expected
of professional educators. Candidates recognize when their own dispositions may need to be adjusted and are
able to develop plans to do so.
Target: Candidates develop the ability to apply research and research methods. Candidates will be able to utilize
technology.
Target: Candidates will collect and analyze data related to their work, reflect on their practice, and use research and technology to support and improve student learning.

Council of Learned Societies in Education (http://members.aol.com/caddogap/clsehome.htm).
Adopted by NCATE 2000 Standards (May 11, 2000, see p. 8 footnote 10).
Principle #1: The educator understands and can apply disciplinary knowledge from the humanities and social sciences to interpreting the meanings of education and schooling in diverse cultural contexts.
Knowledge: The educator has acquired a knowledge base of resources, theories, distinctions, and analytic techniques developed within the humanities, the social sciences, and the foundations of education. The educator understands the central concepts and tools of inquiry of foundational disciplines that bear on the educational process and can apply these to the formulation and review of instructional, administrative, and school leadership and governance procedures.
Dispositions: The educator has developed habits of using this knowledge base in evaluating and formulating educational practice.
Performances: The educator can examine and explain the practice, leadership, and governance of education in different societies in light of its origins, major influences, and consequences, utilizing critical understanding of educational thought and practice and of the decisions and events which have shaped them.
Principle #2: The educator understands and can apply normative perspectives on education and schooling.
Knowledge: The educator understands and employs value orientations and ethical perspectives in analyzing and
interpreting educational ideas, practices, and events.
Dispositions: The educator has developed the habits of examining the normative and ethical assumptions of schooling practice and educational ideas.
Performances: The educator can recognize the inevitable presence of normative influences in educational thought and practice. The educator can appraise conceptions of truth, justice, caring, and rights as they are applied in
educational practice. The educator can assist the examination and development of democratic values that are based on critical study and reflection.
Principle #3: The educator understands and can apply critical perspectives on education and schooling.
Knowledge: The educator understands how the foundations of education knowledge base of resources, theories,
distinctions, and analytic techniques provides instruments for the critical analysis of education in its various forms.
Dispositions: The educator has developed habits of critically examining educational practice in light of this knowledge base.
Performances: The educator can utilize theories and critiques of the overarching purposes of schooling as well as considerations of the intent, meaning, and effects of educational institutions. The educator can identify and appraise educational assumptions and arrangements in a way that can lead to changes in conceptions and values. The educator uses critical judgment to question educational assumptions and arrangements and to identify contradictions and inconsistencies among social and educational values, policies, and practices.
Principle #4: The educator understands how moral principles related to democratic institutions can inform and
direct schooling practice, leadership, and governance.
Knowledge: The educator understands how the foundations of education knowledge base illuminates the conditions which support democracy, democratic citizenship, and education in a democratic society. The educator
understands how various conceptions of the school foster or impede free inquiry, democratic collaboration, and supportive interaction in all aspects of school life.
Dispositions: The educator values democratic forms of association and supports the conditions essential to them. The educator recognizes that political participation constitutes the social basis of democracy.
Performances: The educator participates effectively in individual and organizational efforts that maintain and enhance American schools as institutions in a democratic society. The educator can evaluate the moral, social, and political dimensions of classrooms, teaching, and schools as they relate to life in a democratic society.
Principle #5: The educator understands the full significance of diversity in a democratic society and how that
bears on instruction, school leadership, and governance.
Knowledge: The educator understands how social and cultural differences originating outside the classroom and school affect student learning. The educator has acquired an understanding of education that includes sensitivity to human potentials and differences.
Dispositions: The educator is accepting of individual differences that are consistent with democratic values and
responsibilities. The educator is disposed to the acceptance of human commonality within diversity.
Performances: The educator can adapt instruction to incorporate recognition of social and cultural differences to the extent that it does not interfere with basic democratic principles. The educator can specify how issues such as justice, social inequality, concentrations of power, class differences, race and ethnic relations, or family and community organization affect teaching and schools.
Principle #6: The educator understands how philosophical and moral commitments affect the process of
evaluation at all levels of schooling practice, leadership, and governance.
Knowledge: The educator understands the tacit interests and moral commitments on which the technical processes of evaluation rest. The educator understands that in choosing a measuring device, one necessarily makes moral and philosophical assumptions.
Dispositions: The educator is prepared to consider the ontological, epistemological, and ethical components of an evaluation method.
Performances: The educator can articulate moral and philosophical assumptions underlying an evaluation process. The educator can identify what counts as evidence that a student has (or has not) learned or can (or cannot) learn.

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, 2001 (http://www.nbpts.org/)
Proposition #4: Teachers Think Systematically About Their Practice and Learn from Experience
- Teachers Seek the Advice of Others and Draw on Education Research and Scholarship to Improve Their Practice
- Able teachers are also students of education scholarship and are cognizant of the settled and unsettled territory in their field. They stay abreast of current research and, when appropriate, incorporate new findings into their practice. They take advantage of teacher centers and special conferences and workshops. They might conduct and publish their own research, if so inclined, for testing of new approaches and hypotheses is a commonplace habit among adept teachers, even if a normally overlooked and undocumented one.